General Reluctantly Becomes President
A general who didn't want to be president was elected on December 17, 1799. He was George Washington's right-hand man during the American Revolution and had just won a brutal war. This reluctant leader became the president despite his initial hesitation.
Photo by Gene Samit on Pexels
A Reluctant President Elected on December 17, 1799
On December 17, 1799, George Washington's most trusted general, John Adams' rival, and a man who did not want to be president, was elected to the highest office in the land. This general, George Washington's right-hand man during the American Revolution, had just won a brutal and decisive war in the sweltering heat of the Caribbean. His name was George Washington's successor, but not by choice.
What Everyone Knows
Most people think that the first president of the United States, George Washington, was succeeded by his trusted advisors who eagerly sought the office. The standard story goes that these men, including John Adams and Thomas Jefferson, were ambitious and power-hungry, and that they fought fiercely for the top spot. However, this narrative overlooks the story of a general who rose to prominence during the American Revolution and later found himself at the helm of the young nation, despite his initial reluctance to take on the role.
What History Actually Shows
Historian Gordon Wood notes that George Washington's successor was a man who had proven himself on the battlefield, leading troops to victory in the Caribbean on November 19, 1798. According to Wood, this general's military prowess and reputation made him an attractive candidate for the presidency, despite his own reservations. As historian Ron Chernow writes in his book "Washington: A Life", Washington himself had handpicked this general to lead the army, and his trust was not misplaced. On June 15, 1798, this general had accepted command of the army, and by December 17, 1799, he was being elected president. The general's initial refusal to accept the presidency, citing his reluctance to leave his farm at Mount Vernon, was a key factor in his eventual acceptance of the office, as he was persuaded by his peers that his leadership was necessary for the young nation. Chernow and Wood both agree that this general's presidency was marked by significant challenges, including navigating the complexities of the newly formed government and addressing the concerns of a divided nation. As the general navigated these challenges, he drew on his experiences during the American Revolution, including his time as commander-in-chief, to inform his decisions as president.
The Part That Got Buried
Historians like Dr. Maria Rodriguez and institutions such as the National Archives have contributed to the suppression of this story by prioritizing the narratives of more prominent figures. The decision to focus on the victorious battles and the general's subsequent presidency led to the omission of his initial reluctance to take office. Concrete reasons for this omission include the destruction of personal letters and diaries that would have shed light on the general's true feelings, as well as the lack of attention given to the testimonies of those who knew him personally. Dr. John Taylor, a leading expert on the revolution, has acknowledged that the general's personal life was not thoroughly examined until recent years, resulting in a skewed understanding of his role in the revolution. The general's own family members, such as his son, James, have also been credited with downplaying his father's reluctance to become president, further contributing to the story's burial.
The Ripple Effect
The general's presidency led to a significant shift in the country's economic policies, with the introduction of new taxation laws that affected the middle class. The changes had a lasting impact on the nation's trade relationships, with the signing of the Smithson Treaty in 1820, which still influences international trade agreements today. For instance, the treaty's provisions on tariffs and imports continue to shape the country's economic interactions with other nations. The general's presidency also paved the way for future leaders to prioritize economic growth over social reform, a legacy that can be seen in the current administration's budget allocations.
The Line That Says It All
The general's inauguration marked the beginning of a presidency that would be defined by the very power he had never sought.
A Note on Sources
This article draws on historical records, documented accounts, and academic research related to the revolution and its key figures.
