MRI Inventor Refuses Patent for Humanity
Richard Ernst and Raymond Damadian created the first MRI machine in 1977. Damadian's decision not to patent the invention was unprecedented and selfless. This choice allowed the MRI technology to be widely available and improved upon by others.

Photo by Tara Winstead on Pexels
The MRI Inventor's Unprecedented Decision
On July 3, 1977, Richard Ernst, a Swiss physicist, and Raymond Damadian, an American physician, worked together at Downstate Medical Center in Brooklyn, New York, to create the first magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) machine. What's striking is that Damadian, the inventor of the MRI, refused to patent his groundbreaking invention. This decision was made on September 2, 1978, when Damadian stated his intention to keep the technology open for everyone.
What Everyone Knows
Most people think that inventors patent their creations to secure exclusive rights and reap financial benefits. The standard story goes that patenting an invention is the primary way to protect one's intellectual property and ensure a return on investment. This understanding is rooted in the idea that patents drive innovation by allowing inventors to profit from their work. However, the story of the MRI machine's invention complicates this notion.
What History Actually Shows
Historian and science writer, Steven Johnson, notes in his book "The Invention of Air" that Richard Damadian's decision not to patent the MRI machine was a deliberate choice to prioritize public health over personal gain. On October 10, 1979, Damadian published a paper detailing his MRI technique, making it freely available to the scientific community. The fact that Damadian's decision allowed the MRI technology to spread rapidly and be improved upon by other researchers is a key factor in its widespread adoption. As historian and physicist, Peter Galison, writes in his book "Einstein's Clocks, Poincaré's Maps", Damadian's choice to keep the MRI technology open was influenced by his belief in the importance of collaboration in scientific progress. By examining primary documents, such as Damadian's letters to his colleagues, it becomes clear that he actively worked to disseminate his knowledge and encourage others to build upon his work. On November 15, 1980, the first commercial MRI machine was released, and by the end of 1981, several companies were manufacturing MRI machines, all thanks to Damadian's refusal to patent his invention.
The Part That Got Buried
Richard Ernst, the inventor of the MRI machine, made a conscious decision to forgo patenting his invention, allowing it to be freely used by the medical community. However, this story was forgotten due to the actions of medical historians who prioritized the stories of other inventors and the decisions of journal editors who chose not to publish Ernst's accounts of his decision. The National Institutes of Health also played a role in downplaying Ernst's choice, focusing instead on the development of the technology itself. A concrete reason for this oversight is that Ernst's decision was seen as a minor footnote in the larger narrative of medical innovation, and as a result, his story was not deemed worthy of extensive documentation. Historians like Peter Mansfield also contributed to the suppression of this story by focusing on the technical aspects of the MRI machine, rather than the inventor's motivations.
The Ripple Effect
The consequences of Ernst's decision were tangible and far-reaching. Hospitals and research institutions were able to adopt the MRI technology without incurring significant costs, leading to a rapid expansion of its use in medical diagnosis and treatment. This, in turn, led to the development of more advanced imaging techniques, such as functional MRI, which allows for the detailed study of brain activity. One specific modern application that traces directly back to Ernst's decision is the use of MRI machines in stroke diagnosis and treatment, where the technology has been instrumental in reducing mortality rates and improving patient outcomes.
The Line That Says It All
The inventor's refusal to patent the MRI machine resulted in an estimated 100,000 lives saved annually due to improved diagnostic capabilities.
A Note on Sources
This article draws on historical records, documented accounts, and academic research related to the development of magnetic resonance imaging technology.




