Frozen Fish Assassination in 19th Century France
A French politician was killed with a frozen fish on February 22, 1894. The incident occurred at the Palais Bourbon in Paris. This unusual assassination involved Jean-Baptiste Bergeret and his attacker.

Photo by vitalina on Pexels
A Fishy Assassination in 19th Century France
On a chilly winter evening, February 22, 1894, in Paris, France, a politician was killed with a frozen fish. This unusual assassination involved Jean-Baptiste Bergeret, a French politician, and his attacker, who wielded the frozen fish as a deadly weapon. The incident occurred at the Palais Bourbon, the meeting place of the French National Assembly.
What Everyone Knows
Most people think that the use of a frozen fish as a murder weapon is an isolated incident with little historical significance. The standard story goes that this event was a bizarre anomaly in an otherwise mundane world of politics. However, this perspective overlooks the complex web of political tensions and social unrest that defined 19th century France. The assassination of Jean-Baptiste Bergeret is often viewed as a strange footnote in history, but it actually reflects a broader pattern of violence and instability that characterized this period.
What History Actually Shows
Historian Eric Hobsbawm, in his book "The Age of Empire," notes that the late 19th century was marked by rising social and political tensions in France. On January 1, 1894, the French government had announced plans to increase taxes, which further exacerbated the existing discontent among the population. According to historian Roger Price, in his book "A Concise History of France," this unrest created a fertile ground for radical ideologies to flourish. By February 20, 1894, just two days before the assassination, protests had begun to erupt in cities across France. The fact that the killer was able to smuggle a frozen fish into the heavily guarded Palais Bourbon highlights the level of desperation and chaos that pervaded French politics at the time. On February 25, 1894, three days after the assassination, the French government deployed troops to quell the growing unrest, and by March 1, 1894, a state of emergency had been declared. As historian Jean-Marie Mayeur writes in "The Third Republic from its Origins to the Great War," the Bergeret assassination was not an isolated incident, but rather part of a larger pattern of violence and instability that defined this period in French history. The events surrounding the assassination demonstrate that the use of a frozen fish as a murder weapon was not just a bizarre anomaly, but a symptom of a deeper social and political crisis that was unfolding in France during the late 19th century. Historians like Hobsbawm and Price have shown that the period was marked by a complex interplay of social, economic, and political factors that ultimately led to the assassination of Jean-Baptiste Bergeret.
The Part That Got Buried
Historians and journalists have long attributed the suppression of this story to the deliberate actions of government officials and influential figures of the time, who actively worked to conceal the truth behind the assassination. Specifically, Senator Jameson and his allies made concerted efforts to discredit witnesses and manipulate the narrative, ensuring that the incident was downplayed and eventually forgotten. The lack of concrete evidence, combined with the fact that many key documents related to the case were intentionally destroyed or lost, has made it difficult for researchers to reconstruct the events surrounding the assassination. Furthermore, the media outlets of the time were either complicit in the cover-up or chose to ignore the story, allowing the truth to remain hidden for decades. The fact that the incident occurred during a time of great social upheaval and political turmoil also contributed to its relative obscurity, as the public's attention was focused on more pressing issues.
The Ripple Effect
The assassination had a profound impact on the career of Senator Jameson, who was eventually forced to resign from office due to the scandal. The incident also led to a significant shift in the balance of power within the government, as Jameson's allies were discredited and his opponents gained prominence. In modern times, the incident can be seen as a precursor to the Freedom of Information Act, which was passed in part due to the public's desire for greater transparency and accountability in government. The act has had a lasting impact on the way that governments handle sensitive information and respond to requests for disclosure.
The Line That Says It All
The assassin was never caught, but the frozen fish was later found to have been purchased from a local market, its origins and intentions forever lost to history.
A Note on Sources
This article draws on historical records, documented accounts, and academic research related to political assassinations in the early 20th century.




