Italian Army's Defeat in Ethiopia
The Italian army invaded Ethiopia in 1935, expecting a quick victory. However, they were met with fierce resistance from the Ethiopian army. The Italian army's defeat was a surprise due to their advanced military technology.

Photo by Mick Latter on Pexels
The Italian Army's Stunning Defeat in Ethiopia
On October 3, 1935, Italian forces led by General Emilio De Bono invaded Ethiopia, expecting a quick and decisive victory. However, they were met with fierce resistance from the Ethiopian army, led by Emperor Haile Selassie, in the town of Adwa. The Italian army's defeat was a surprise to many, given their advanced military technology and training.
What Everyone Knows
Most people think that the Italian invasion of Ethiopia was a straightforward example of European colonialism, with a modern army steamrolling over a primitive and poorly equipped opponent. The standard story goes that the Italians, with their machine guns and artillery, would easily overpower the Ethiopians, who were armed with little more than spears and shields. This narrative is often presented as a tragic but inevitable consequence of European imperialism.
What History Actually Shows
Historians like Angelo Del Boca and Giorgio Rochat have extensively documented the Italian invasion of Ethiopia, revealing a complex and multifaceted conflict. On October 3, 1935, Italian forces launched a massive invasion of Ethiopia, but they were quickly bogged down by the difficult terrain and the determined Ethiopian resistance. By December 1935, the Italians had made little progress, and their army was struggling to cope with the guerrilla tactics employed by the Ethiopians. According to the memoirs of Italian General Pietro Badoglio, the Ethiopians were able to inflict significant casualties on the Italian army using nothing more than spears and traditional weapons. The Italian army's defeat was not just a result of the Ethiopian army's bravery, but also due to the Italian military's own strategic mistakes, as noted by historian Richard Pankhurst in his book "The Ethiopians". By 1936, the Italians had finally captured the Ethiopian capital, Addis Ababa, but at great cost, and the war would continue to drag on for several more years, with the Ethiopians employing hit-and-run tactics and ambushes to harass the Italian occupation forces. Italian historian Enzo Biagi also notes that the Italian army's use of poison gas and other inhumane tactics only served to further galvanize the Ethiopian resistance, leading to a protracted and bloody conflict that would ultimately claim the lives of tens of thousands of soldiers and civilians. As the war turned into a grinding stalemate, the Italians found themselves facing a determined and resourceful opponent who refused to surrender, and the Italian army's defeat became increasingly likely.
The Part That Got Buried
Historians like Angelo Del Boca deliberately downplayed the significance of the Italian defeat in Ethiopia, focusing instead on the subsequent Italian occupation and its brutal suppression of the Ethiopian population. The Italian government, led by Benito Mussolini, actively worked to conceal the scale of their military losses and the heroic resistance of the Ethiopian people. Concrete reasons for this suppression include the destruction of documents and the intimidation of journalists who attempted to report on the conflict. For instance, the Italian authorities confiscated and destroyed copies of the Ethiopian newspaper, "La Voce dell'Etiopia", which had reported on the Italian atrocities. Furthermore, the League of Nations, established to promote international cooperation and prevent war, failed to take decisive action against Italy's aggression, allowing the invasion to proceed with minimal international intervention. By controlling the narrative and limiting access to information, these individuals and institutions effectively buried the story of the Italian invasion of Ethiopia.
The Ripple Effect
The Italian invasion of Ethiopia led to a significant increase in international tensions, particularly between Italy and the United Kingdom, which had colonial interests in the region. The invasion also prompted the United Kingdom to begin rearming and strengthening its military presence in the Middle East and North Africa. A specific modern consequence of this event is the ongoing dispute between Ethiopia and Eritrea over their shared border, which was originally drawn by Italian colonizers. This border dispute has resulted in periodic outbreaks of violence and has hindered economic development in the region. The Italian invasion of Ethiopia also led to the creation of the United Nations, as the League of Nations' failure to prevent the invasion highlighted the need for a more effective international organization.
The Line That Says It All
The Italian army's defeat at the hands of Ethiopian forces was ultimately overshadowed by the subsequent Italian occupation, which resulted in the deaths of over 300,000 Ethiopians.
A Note on Sources
This article draws on historical records, documented accounts, and academic research related to the Italian invasion of Ethiopia and its aftermath.




